Today we will take a look at the Nokia Asha 201 and Nokia C3 along both of type QWERTY aims to people that you love to send instant messages, texts and emails. Both look similar, but there are many subtle differences.
Are well designed both in itself. At first glance the Nokia Asha 201 seems like a more fun version of the Nokia C3. Characterized by its exquisite design and curves that make you feel a great deal of comfort is in your hand and more aerodynamicallyNokia C3 weighs 114 grams, either with Nokia Asha 201 and weighing only slightly less than the 105 grams
QWERTY keyboard, Nokia Asha 201 and Nokia C3 has a menu buttons with shortcuts to accept and end calls, e-mail, browser, and the main difference here is to support existing keys and no vertical in the Nokia Asha 201 and horizontal in the Nokia C3. We are in location and Akimobail of prefer the latter, which are easier to use to pressure when needed.The essential difference between the two is that the Nokia Asha 201 carries two tranches and be able to use the phone lines to the same this year is available for Nokia C3Allows Nokia Asha 201 to accept an external memory up to 32 GB which is a big advantageBattery Nokia Asha stronger and more durable for a longer period of useBut Nokia C3 has a Wi-Fi is available in the Nokia Asha 201 And largest in the Nokia C3 and make the best use
For each screen of the Nokia Asha 201 and Nokia C3 does not amaze anyone, but they perform well: bright color display, and menus that are easy to read. Although surfing the Internet needs a bigger screen. But both are equally in the screen and its potentialFor USB ports and memory card slots are well made, and both of them to insert slot 3.5mm headset.Both of the phones good medium the serve their purpose well designed nicelyAfter outlook on Nokia Asha 201 vs Nokia C3 final ruling is due to your needs in your phone that you want
| Preference | (0% global votes) | (0% global votes) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | ? | ||
| Category | |||
| Screen | |||
| Screen size diagonal | 2.4 ″ | 2.4 ″ | |
| Screen type | |||
| Pixel long side | 320 | 320 | |
| Pixel short side | 240 | 240 | |
| Screen pixel | 76.8 kilopixel | 76.8 kilopixel | |
| Input | |||
| Touchscreen | No | No | |
| Multi-touch | no | no | |
| Keyboard | |||
| Network | |||
| Cellular radio | |||
| W-Lan | Yes | Yes | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | |
| Sensors | |||
| Navigation/GPS | ? | No | |
| Proximity Sensor | No | ? | |
| Camera | |||
| Pixel effective (camera) | 2 megapixel | 2 megapixel | |
| Autofocus | ? | No | |
| Flash | No | ? | |
| Face/secondary camera | No | ? | |
| Software | |||
| Operating system | |||
| Software distribution | |||
| Storage | |||
| Memory (RAM) | 64 MB | ? | |
| Permanent storage | 55 MB | 10 MB | |
| Memory card | |||
| Processor | |||
| Cores | 1 | 1 | |
| Battery | |||
| Battery life max. | 7 h | 7 h | |
| Battery life standby max. | 800 h | 888 h | |
| Battery capacity | 1.32 Ah | ? | |
| Ports | |||
| USB port | Yes | Yes | |
| Dimensions | |||
| Long side | 11.6 cm | 11.5 cm | |
| Short side | 5.8 cm | 6.11 cm | |
| Thickness | 1.4 cm | 1.4 cm | |
| Form | |||
| Weight | 114 g | 105 g | |
| Info | |||
No comments:
Post a Comment