Comparison between Motorola Razar and Samsung Galaxy S 2

When we talk about the top Android phones, we should mention these two devices, as they offer a great performer on a lot of levels. If you are at the gates to get a new Android phone to replace your previous phone, or if this is your first experience in the world of Android, maybe you'll find great interest in this topic.

The overall design

Both phones have enjoyed a wonderful design, but there are some differences that we will talk about. the Motorola beats all other phones, estimated thickness 7.1 mm, but the Galaxy S 2 phone is not much different from the figure, where up to 8.49 mm thick. In terms of weight Galaxy S 2  outperform lighter weight, and due to the light plastic material which it is made the body of the device, while in contrast, Motorola is made of metal material greater weight. When talking about the width and height, larger apparatus Motorola Samsung device, even though they carry the same size screen.

There is also a Home button on the Galaxy S 2, which facilitates the opening screen lock button being physical and not just touch. Galaxy S 2 audio buttons on the opposite side of the play button, and compared Motorola They are the easiest to access and easier to press. But RAZR is superior in terms of elegance,  the oblique angles and back made with good material make it the best in its field.

Screen 

Will be here comparison difficult, Motorola the RAZAR and Galaxy S 2 also carrying a Super AMOLED screen. But Motorola holds Advance-type screen and Samsung screen type Plus. Galaxy S 2 will get 480 x 800 pixels, while you'll get a 540 x 960 pixels on Motorola, and we will find this useful in navigation, for example. We note in location and Akimobail of the screen Conexant, have a higher illumination from a Motorola device and thus offer better performance abroad and in front of the sun. 

User Interface 

Interface devices are used especially applied over the original Android interface, but they are not at the same level. Samsung uses the fourth generation of interface Touch Wiz, which has evolved considerably and reached an advanced stage of maturity, they are excellent in appearance, quick and performance in the process.Motorola uses its own interface, too, but have yet to reach the level of those in the Samsung, both in design and graphics as well. Finally, there is the control panel device-specific, both works wonderfully, But Galaxy S 2 offers a broad characters and buttons easier to pressure from those on Motorola. 

Applications and characteristics 

As is the case with the interface, some applications in Motorola offers exotic options.For example, the application of images does not allow you to browse the albums immediately, but require you to press another button before entering the surf. The web browser you are not allowed to see a review of the pages while on the move between different windows, but their status is based on the form of a list. Certainly Conexant offers just the opposite. 
But Motorola offers several very useful properties within the package. First there is the Smart Action, which allows you to teach the phone to perform certain functions at the completion of certain conditions, you can read more about them in the separate phone review.

Camera and photography 

Unfortunately, the biggest weakness in the Motorola device is a camera, although it is equal to the power of those on the Galaxy S 2, but they do not offer the same performance. This applies to photography and video shooting hard, and it seems the most obvious difference in low-light situations.